
Traditional technology due diligence frameworks from both the large and mid-sized consultancies have served us well for years. These approaches typically examine IT infrastructure, applications portfolios, digital capabilities, and cybersecurity postures. However, as technology becomes more central to business value and as new risks emerge (particularly around AI adoption), these frameworks are showing critical gaps.
Most notably, traditional frameworks often:
The Quality of Technology framework represents an evolution in technology due diligence by addressing these gaps while providing a structured maturity model that helps organizations not just identify where they stand, but chart a clear path forward.
The QoT framework examines three critical dimensions:
What sets this approach apart is its dual focus on both current state assessment and maturity progression. By evaluating organizations on a 1-5 maturity scale, the QoT framework transforms due diligence from a point-in-time snapshot to a forward-looking strategic tool.


1. Technology Is the Value Driver, Not Just Support Infrastructure
In many modern acquisitions, technology assets represent the primary value driver rather than merely supporting infrastructure. The difference between a technology stack that can scale, adapt, and create competitive advantage versus one burdened with technical debt and security vulnerabilities can make or break an acquisition's ROI.
The QoT framework helps acquirers understand not just what technology exists, but its quality and readiness to support future business objectives. This shifts the conversation from "what do they have?" to "how well will it serve our combined future?"
2. AI Adoption Creates New Risk Dimensions
As organizations rapidly adopt AI technologies, traditional due diligence frameworks have struggled to keep pace. The QoT framework specifically addresses AI risk across multiple dimensions: secure integration, data governance, employee awareness, usage monitoring, secure development, and vendor management.
This is increasingly critical as target companies may be using AI tools that create previously unconsidered risks around data leakage, intellectual property exposure, or compliance violations.
3. Maturity Assessment Enables Strategic Planning
Unlike frameworks that focus primarily on risk identification, the QoT approach establishes clear maturity levels (from Stage 1 to Stage 5). This allows acquiring organizations to:
4. Concrete Metrics Drive Objective Assessment
The QoT framework provides specific metrics for each risk category. For example, rather than simply assessing "cybersecurity," it examines metrics like incident numbers, control effectiveness, and response time. This transforms due diligence from a subjective exercise to a measurement-driven process that supports data-based decision making.
5. Employee Factors Are Properly Weighted
While traditional frameworks often focus on systems and processes, the QoT approach recognizes the critical human element in technology risk. By evaluating employee awareness, training programs, and understanding of emerging risks (particularly around AI), it addresses a dimension frequently underweighted in conventional due diligence.
Expanding your due diligence process to incorporate a Quality of Technology framework doesn't require abandoning existing methodologies. Instead, consider these implementation strategies:
The most compelling reason to adopt a Quality of Technology framework is its ability to transform due diligence from a risk mitigation exercise into a value creation opportunity. By understanding not just what risks exist but how to advance technology capabilities, organizations can:
In an era where technology increasingly drives business value, organizations that expand their due diligence approach with a Quality of Technology framework gain both deeper insight into acquisition targets and clearer pathways to post-merger success.
As the technology landscape continues to evolve with AI and other emerging innovations, the QoT framework provides a forward-looking approach that helps organizations not just assess where target companies are today, but envision what they could become tomorrow.
Based in the US, Matt is the founder of Hartzman Partners LLC, where he advises mid-market organisations on technology risk, cybersecurity, and digital governance.With over 30 years of experience, Matt has held CIO roles in healthcare, led six consulting firms, supported start-ups, and served on four corporate boards.He brings a rare mix of business strategy, technical expertise, and a deep commitment to purpose-driven leadership - qualities that align with GAA’s mission.Matt also volunteers with non-profits and supports innovation through public speaking, writing, and board service.
Read how they tackle today’s challenges and shape tomorrow’s solutions